|
Fact Sheet on Senate Budget Process: 97-930 GOV
The Budget Enforcement Act of 1997
Robert Keith, Specialist in American National Government
Government and Finance Division
October 8, 1997
President Clinton signed
two reconciliation acts into law in August 1997 as part of a plan to balance the budget by FY2002.
To ensure compliance with this goal, enforcement procedures were included in one of the acts in a title referred
to separately as the Budget Enforcement Act (BEA) of 1997. The BEA of 1997 extends procedures under the Budget Enforcement
Act (BEA) of 1990 through FY2002.(1)
Background
The BEA of 1990 established discretionary spending limits and a pay-as-you-go
(PAYGO) requirement as an amendment to the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.
The two mechanisms rely upon sequestration, first established by the 1985 act, for enforcement. Sequestration involves automatic,
across-the-board spending reductions, triggered generally after the close of a congressional session by a report
issued by the director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
The BEA of 1990 also made extensive modifications in the congressional budget process
under the Congressional
Budget Act of 1974. In particular, it established a new Title VI
that made temporary changes in the congressional budget process, including requirements that budget resolutions cover five, rather
than three, fiscal years and be enforced for the full five-year period, and modifications in the procedures
for allocating and suballocating to committees spending levels in the budget resolution.
The procedures established by the BEA of 1990 were meant to guarantee compliance
with the five-year (FY1991-1995) deficit-reduction policies contained in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act
of 1990. Many of the changes, set to expire in FY1995, were extended through FY1998 by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation
Act of 1993. The bipartisan budget agreement reached between the President and congressional leaders in May 1997,
and the budget resolution adopted by Congress in June, recommended that the budget be balanced by FY2002.
As part of the agreements, the enforcement procedures under the BEA of 1990 were to be extended through FY2002.
Legislative History of the BEA of 1997
The House initially included the budget process changes in the Balanced
Budget Act of 1997, H.R. 2015. They were added to the bill under an amendment developed by Representative John
Kasich, chairman of the House Budget Committee. The Kasich amendment was incorporated into the bill automatically
upon the adoption of a special
rule. The House passed the bill, as amended, on June 25 by a vote
of 270-162.
The Senate initially included comparable changes in the Taxpayer Relief
Act of 1997, H.R. 2014. They were added to the bill under an amendment (number 537) offered by Senators Pete Domenici
and Frank Lautenberg, the chairman and ranking
minority member of the Senate Budget Committee, respectively. The
Senate passed the bill, as amended, on June 27 by a vote of 80-18.
Conferees
on the two measures decided to include the budget process changes in the Balanced Budget Act. On July
30, the House agreed to the conference
report (H.Rept. 105-217) on the measure by a vote of 346-85; the
Senate agreed to the conference report on July 31 by a vote of 85-15. On August 5, President Clinton signed the
measure into law as P.L. 105-33 (111 Stat.
251). The budget process changes are contained in Title X of the act (111 Stat. 677-712), which is entitled the "Budget Enforcement Act of 1997."
Summary of the BEA of 1997
The BEA of 1997 extends the discretionary spending limits and PAYGO requirement, enforced by sequestration, through FY2002. New categories of discretionary spending are used under the limits:
defense and nondefense for FY1998 and FY1999; violent crime reduction for FY1998-FY2000; and discretionary (a single
category) for FY2000-2002. Procedures for periodically making adjustments in the limits are modified, in part to
accommodate legislation for International Monetary Fund (IMF) replenishments, international arrearages, and an
earned income tax compliance initiative. The PAYGO requirement covers the effects through FY 2006 of legislation
enacted through FY2002. Further, the "look-back" feature under the PAYGO process is modified to eliminate
any double counting that may occur if legislation is enacted during a session after the final OMB sequestration
report has been issued.
In addition, the BEA of 1997 makes permanent many of the temporary changes
in Title VI of the 1974 Congressional Budget Act (by repealing Title VI, but incorporating its components into
other sections of the 1974 act or the 1985 Balanced Budget Act). In particular, budget resolutions must cover five
fiscal years at a minimum and are enforced for this full period, and the modified procedures for making committee
allocations and suballocations of spending under a budget resolution are retained (and revised further). Also,
aggregate spending levels, committee allocations, and other budgetary levels may be adjusted periodically, under
a new Section 314 of the 1974 act, to reflect the enactment of specified legislation covering designated emergencies,
IMF funding, international arrearages, and other matters. These adjustments are meant to parallel similar adjustments
made in the statutory discretionary spending limits.
Finally, the BEA of 1997 makes other changes in the sequestration and congressional
budget processes, including many technical and conforming changes that correct certain drafting errors in the BEA
of 1990 and bring the law up to date for various changes enacted during the interim.
1. For a more detailed discussion of the BEA
of 1997, see: Budget Enforcement Act of 1997: Summary and Legislative History, by Robert Keith, CRS Report 97-931 GOV, October 8, 1997. (PDF format)
|
|